“Humanity…must summon the moral courage to prevail against the danger the fusion of AI with nuclear weapons creates”
The following remarks were delivered by Dr. James Muller, IPPNW Co-Founder, at the Global Nobel Laureates Assembly on Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear War at Castel Gandolfo, Italy on 14 July, 2026
Thank you. Nobelists, your Eminence Cardinal Baggio and Your Eminence Cardinal Tomasi, Enzo, Alessio and your great team. Thank you for the opportunity to speak.
The fusion of AI with nuclear weapons creates an immediate, worldwide danger – a threat that cannot be countered by individual nations consumed with their geopolitical disagreements. A worldwide agreement and collective action is needed.
My hope is that this Vatican Assembly, with its phenomenal participants, can help humanity find the common voice required for survival.
I am speaking as a co-founder of International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War, or IPPNW, which was built on agreement between adversaries in 1980 as our governments talked of winning a nuclear war, we contacted our Russian medical colleagues to create IPPNW. We worked across Cold War barriers against the concept that nuclear war could be won. In 1985 the Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize to IPPNW for alerting the world to the medical consequences of the use of nuclear weapons. This helped generate a world-wide popular movement, that, together with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, led to a decrease in the number of nuclear weapons from over 60,000 in 1980 to approximately 12,000 today.
Read more…[The IPPNW Executive Committee has sent the following open letter to the leadership of the Israel Medical Association, regarding the treatment of Palestinians detained by Israel, with particular concern for the condition of Dr. Abu Safiya.]
14 July 2026
Professor Zion Hagay, President
Adv. Leah Wapnerm Chief Executive Officer
Israel Medical Association
Dear Prof Hagay and Adv. Wapnerm:
Since October 2023, Physicians for Human Rights–Israel (PHRI) has published extensive documentation alleging serious violations of medical ethics and the right to health in relation to Palestinians detained in Israeli prisons, military detention facilities, and civilian hospitals. These reports describe prolonged denial or delay of medical treatment, inadequate access to specialist care, treatment under conditions of prolonged restraint and blindfolding, failures to investigate suspected abuse, and ethical concerns surrounding the field hospital established at Sde Teiman.
Read more…Global Nobel Laureates call for the abolition of nuclear weapons, noting risks of AI integration
A Global Assembly of Nobel Laureates called Thursday for rapid action to bring about the complete elimination of nuclear weapons. The Assembly was initiated by IPPNW and the Nobel Laureates Assembly for the Prevention of Nuclear War and was hosted by the Vatican at Castel Gandolfo, the Pope’s summer residence.
Read more…
Humanity has long searched for ways to restrain violence and protect life even in the harshest moments of conflict. International Humanitarian Law, with its rules on protecting civilians, humane treatment of prisoners, and limits on the means and methods of warfare, represents the modern legal expression of this aspiration. Yet the ethical foundations of these rules were shaped long before treaties were drafted or conventions adopted. Across civilizations, individuals acted on conscience to defend human dignity when war threatened to erase it. Among these figures, Emir Abdelkader al-Jazairi and Henry Dunant stand out as two of the most compelling examples of moral courage preceding legal codification. Their lives remind humanitarian advocates today that the law was born from human choices, and that restraint in war is first a moral act before it becomes a legal obligation.
Read more…A dream deferred, but still alive
On March 1, 1945, only six weeks before his death, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered an address to Congress that pointed toward a sweeping transformation of international relations.
With the Axis powers tottering toward defeat in World War II, Roosevelt reported that the recently concluded Yalta conference of Allied leaders had agreed upon “a common ground for peace.” It would “spell the end of the system of unilateral action, the exclusive alliances, the spheres of influence, the balances of power, and all the other expedients that have been tried for centuries―and have always failed.” These approaches would be replaced by “a universal organization,” a “permanent structure of peace upon which we can begin to build . . . that better world in which our children and grandchildren . . . must live, and can live.”
Read more…
Revisiting Mark Twain’s writings, I experienced a familiar moral unease, the kind that arises when a truth becomes too clear to ignore. It comes from recognizing how easily humanity justifies forms of violence that contradict the dignity it claims to uphold. This unease deepened as I reread “The Damned Human Race,” where Twain exposes a pattern that still defines our age: harm becomes most dangerous not when it is committed, but when it is rationalized. Through the lens of human security, his satire raises an unresolved question: can any society call itself secure while accepting avoidable harm as a condition of order?
Read more…The ICJ Advisory Opinion—What did it give us?
On this day, 30 years ago, the International Court of Justice published its historic document on the Legality of Use and Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons. It was the result of a worldwide campaign by a network of over 500 organisations, led by IPPNW, IALANA and IPB. But did the nuclear disarmament community get the result it wanted? Opinion on the Opinion was divided. The third and final part of this anniversary series on the ICJ Opinion looks at what we achieved, and what is to be done next.
30 Years Later: The World Court Project
Tomorrow, on 8 July, the Advisory Opinion on the legality of nuclear weapons will be thirty years old. What did the World Court Project change? This is the second part of a three-part series looking at what led up to the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice in The Hague in 1996, and what it meant for the process towards complete nuclear disarmament.
30 years ago, on 8 July 1996, a groundbreaking document was published: the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Use and Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons. It was the result of a civil society campaign, spearheaded by IPPNW, together with the International Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA), and the International Peace Bureau (IPB). To mark the anniversary, I will—in three posts—give an overview of the Opinion, briefly cover the history and the process in which I was centrally involved, and share my conclusions about what it has changed in the past 30 years.
From independence to interdependence
As Americans and people of other former colonies recognize, there’s a great deal to be said for national independence.
But, at times, we might also wonder: is it sufficient?
Read more…
Bimal Khadka
Bjorn Hilt
Charles K. Johnson
Dr. Ghassan Shahrour
Gunnar Westberg
IPPNW
John Loretz
Lawrence Wittner
Maria Valenti
mollymcgint
Sue Wareham
Tilman Ruff
Tim Wright
Xanthe Hall
IPPNW peace and health blog 