Skip to content

Let’s think about how to build a more peaceful world

August 7, 2024
Flag raising at UN Headquarters, New York City; UN Photo/Manuel Elías

Although the current US presidential campaign has focused almost entirely on domestic issues, Americans live on a planet engulfed in horrific wars, an escalating arms race, and repeated threats of nuclear annihilation.  Amid this dangerous reality, shouldn’t we give some thought to how to build a more peaceful future?

Read more…

Donald Trump’s reckless infatuation with nuclear weapons

July 22, 2024

Over the past decade and more, nuclear war has grown increasingly likely.  Most nuclear arms control and disarmament agreements of the past have been discarded by the nuclear powers or will expire soon.  Moreover, there are no nuclear arms control negotiations underway.  Instead, all nine nuclear nations (Russia, the United States, China, Britain, France, India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea) have begun a new nuclear arms race, qualitatively improving the 12,121 nuclear weapons in existence or building new, much faster, and deadlier weapons.  Furthermore, the cautious, diplomatic statements about international relations that characterized an earlier era have given way to public threats of nuclear war, issued by top officials in Russia, the United States, and North Korea.  

This June, UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that, given the heightened risk of nuclear annihilation, “humanity is on a knife’s edge.”

This increasingly menacing situation owes a great deal to Donald Trump.

Read more…

Military emissions compound the costs and consequences of war

June 27, 2024

by Sue Wareham

A new report from the Conflict and Environment Observatory estimates that militaries may be responsible for 5.5% of global emissions. [CEO graphic]

One’s immediate thought on looking at any of the multitude of photos of the devastation of Gaza is a profound sense of sorrow and grief at the capacity of humans to wreak such destruction and suffering. There is mind-numbing despair at the plight of children who have lost everything—their parents, other family members, their own health, their education, their fun, their society, their future.

As catastrophic as this is, it is not even the full picture of the harm being wrought in the destruction of Gaza. One can’t help wondering also: when rebuilding eventually starts, where will whole neighbourhoods of rubble go? It will need new neighbourhoods of rubble simply to hold it all, or that very useful waste dump—the ocean. Moving it all and starting again will be part of a hidden problem in the war on Gaza—its greenhouse gas emissions.

Read more…

WHO and “The Effect of Nuclear War on Health and Health Services”

June 26, 2024
Dr. Juva speaking at IPPNW’s side event at the World Health Assembly in May.

by Kati Juva

IPPNW was founded more than 40 years ago, and the main objective was to tell people—decision makers, physicians, students and the public about the devastating consequences of nuclear weapons and nuclear war. At the height of the Cold War, the threat of a nuclear war was palpable and even young children had fears of the end of the world. Meanwhile, in many parts of the world, bomb shelters were built that were said to protect from atomic bombs, and children were taught to “duck and cover” under the school desks were they to see an explosion flash. 

Read more…

“We reject war” reflections from The Vatican’s World Meeting on Human Fraternity

June 19, 2024

by Dr. David Onazi, IPPNW Co-President

l-r: Drs. David Onazi, Carlos Umaña, and Kati Juva

On 10-11 May 2024, The Vatican’s Fratelli Tutti Foundation brought twenty Noble Laureates and leaders together for the second World Meeting on Human Fraternity. Represented by three of our four Co-Presidents — Drs. Kati Juva, David Onazi, and Carlos Umaña — IPPNW participated in the meeting and the drafting of the Declaration, “We Reject War: Let diplomacy prevail over arms. We want Peace!”, ensuring that the urgent need to eliminate nuclear weapons was captured in the final statement.

Read more…

Call for Sanity, Call for Action

June 12, 2024

[The following statement was adopted by IPPNW’s International Council (IC) at the conclusion of our June 2024 virtual IC and Board meetings.]

Today humankind faces the twin existential threats of climate change and nuclear war. The former is already making large parts of our planet uninhabitable; far greater climate action is critically needed. For nuclear war, which could kill billions and end human civilisation, prevention is the only cure. 

IPPNW Board of Directors, June 2024

At the same time, war and armed conflict has killed or injured hundreds of thousands of people. Millions more have been forced to abandon their homes. The already devastating conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine involving nuclear-armed states raise the spectre of wider regional wars or even a global confrontation. Respect for international humanitarian law and the protection of civilians, children, and health professionals in armed conflict must be restored.

Read more…

Re-engaging WHO on nuclear weapons and health

June 7, 2024
Dr. Tilman Ruff speaks at IPPNW’s World Health Assembly side event on 31 May.

[The following is an edited version of a presentation made by IPPNW board member and former co-president Tilman Ruff at an IPPNW side event at the World Health Assembly in Geneva on 31 May. The event was co-sponsored by Austria, Kazakhstan, and Mexico.]

I’m honoured to say a few words on behalf of IPPNW to encourage and support renewed engagement by WHO in the issue of nuclear weapons and health, and specifically for an updated report on the effects of nuclear war on health and health services. 

Indeed, as the world’s leading technical agency in health, WHO has a unique role in providing authoritative evidence on the most acute existential threat facing humankind, as a key part of the evidence base to underpin informed policies of member states.

Read more…

Enforcement of international law is long overdue

June 4, 2024
The International Court of Justice held public hearings in the case South Africa v. Israel in May. [ICJ photo]

International law―the recognized rules of behavior among nations based on customary practices and treaties, among them the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights―has been agreed upon by large and small nations alike.  To implement this law, the nations of the world have established a UN Security Council (to maintain international peace and security) and a variety of international courts, including the UN’s International Court of Justice(which adjudicates disputes between nations and gives advisory opinions on international legal issues) and the International Criminal Court (which prosecutes individuals for crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression).

Yet nations continue to defy international law.

Read more…

Disarmament for Climate Justice and Health: reflections and direction following COP28

May 10, 2024

by Dr. Bimal Khadka, originally published to Medact’s blog on May 1, 2024.

Drs. Bimal Khadka and Angelika Claussen outside of COP28 in Dubai, UAE

Back in December, the 28th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC), better known as COP28, hosted an unprecedented assembly of health delegates – setting a historic benchmark. I attended the conference as part of a delegation from International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), of which Medact is the UK affiliate. Over 1900 health professionals observed a landmark inaugural ‘Health Day’ at the conference. With the goal of Disarmament for Climate Justice and Health, IPPNW and Medact participated at COP28 to ensure human and environmental health was at the center of decision making. Here are some key highlights from the conference, and considerations of the path towards disarmament for health and climate justice.

Read more…

Nuclear War: Too much information

May 8, 2024

Book review of “Nuclear War. A Scenario” by Annie Jacobsen

I had heard some criticism of Annie Jacobsen’s book “Nuclear War” before I even bought it. But also, lots of people were raving about it, so I decided to read it myself. This review contains a few spoilers, but I don’t think the plot is the main motivation for reading this book, although it does read like a dystopian novel.

If you want to know what a full-scale nuclear war might look like and how it could plausibly begin (and end), then this book is very valuable. Just looking at the copious notes and bibliography (almost 60 pages) shows that an inordinate amount of time went into the research. It covers nuclear strategy and targeting plans, the effects of one and of multiple explosions, (lack of) continuance of government, the uselessness of missile defence, the problem of misunderstanding and miscalculation, and many other aspects of the problem.

Read more…